Nader et la coalition révolutionnaire

Ouverture libre

   Forum

Il n'y a pas de commentaires associés a cet article. Vous pouvez réagir.

   Imprimer

 1022

Nader et la coalition révolutionnaire

L’idée est de plus en plus répandue, d’une coalition de l’extrême droite US (les libertariens) et de l’extrême gauche également US (les progressistes). On connaît les “vedettes” (au Congrès, au cœur du Système) de cette tendance qui se forme elle-même, exactement comme un système antiSystème : Ron Paul, Barney Frank, Bernie Sanders… Nous parlons souvent de tous ces braves gens.

Ralph Nader est enthousiaste à ce propos. Pöur lui, c’est la formule qui pourrait permettre de faire exploser le Système. (Dans RAW Story le 13 janvier 2011.)

«Longtime American politics gadfly Ralph Nader, a man of many ideas almost diametrically opposed by most libertarian conservatives, said Wednesday that he sees a coming convergence of liberals, progressives and libertarian conservatives in the wake of a worsening financial crisis and dogged partisanship that's put the government into gridlock.

»Speaking to Fox Business's libertarian host Judge Napolitano, Nader called these shifting alliances “the most exciting new political dynamic” in the US today. Nader has long been an advocate of overturning “corporate personhood”: an oft' criticized legal principle that treats massive organizations with vast stores of wealth as individuals under the law.

»So how will this left-right alliance begin?

»Nader suggested that it already has, thanks to the unity of Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), the most conservative and most liberal members of their respective chambers. They've teamed up to propose cuts to the US defense budget, which has long been by far the largest sector of America's annual budget, and to push a more thorough audit of the Federal Reserve, the private central bank which controls America's currency.

»Republicans, who were elected to a majority in the House of Representatives on promises to cut government spending, promised to cut $100 billion from the budget in their first year. Relatively few have proposed significant decreases in defense spending, and GOP leadership has outright dismissed the possibility. Some prominent members of the House GOP caucus have even suggested the sum of their austerity measures could fall to only $30 billion, if that.

»Republicans in Congress have instead championed their success in extending President George W. Bush's tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. The Congressional Research Service reported that extending debased tax rates to the wealthy will add an additional $5.08 trillion to the US deficit over the next 10 years.

»Nader added that the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act, which recently failed due to a secret hold by a Republican Senator even in the face of support by libertarian conservatives and progressive liberals, could be the linchpin that brings the two groups together.

»"The authentic tea partiers hail from the conservative libertarian wing of the Republican party that has been so disrespected and corporatized by the likes of Bush and Cheney," Nader said. "So here they come into town and they're going to go after a lot of things the Republican establishment is opposed to.” He added that a coming "liberal-conservative connection" will ultimately “draw that distinction between the corporatist and the genuine libertarian conservatives.”

»Even Napolitano agreed that there's a “certain philosophical agreement” underlying “the role of government in our lives” that's become shared by libertarians and progressives.

»“The key thing is when they go after all the bloated corporate welfare subsidies, handouts, give-aways, bailouts – they're going to alienate all these corporate Republicans, but they don't care,” he said. “The one's I'm talking about, in the House and Senate, they operate on principle. They don't care if they're overruled, if they don't get the monuments or the freebies. They operate on principle and they're going to make an alliance with the liberal progressives.”»

dedefensa.org