Le bloc BAO et Daesh : un coup j’te vois, un coup j’te vois pas

Le bloc BAO et Daesh : un coup j’te vois, un coup j’te vois pas

... Il est vrai que, durant cette année au cours de laquelle le bloc BAO, flamboyants USA en  tête, ont mené leur grande campagne contre Daesh, les résultats, – d’une maigreur de grande famine, – ont été extraordinaires d'insignifiance. On nous expliqua parfois que les groupes terroristes étaient très difficiles à identifier, sinon même à localiser, et tout le monde regretta grandement cette incroyable habileté de l’État Islamique à se balader dans le désert comme si c’était les Champs Elysées à l’heure de pointe ou le Sahara à l’heure des vents du simoun levant des tempêtes de sable aveuglant même les puissants radars et satellites.

Là-dessus, tout change. Le décompte que font l’OTAN, les USA & consorts des objectifs attaqués par les Russes est au millimètre près, et chacun parfaitement identifié comme s’il portait une affiche gigantesque destinées aux observateurs du Ciel, avec son  affiliation, da marquedéposée, etc., en arabe et en anglais (et même en russe, c'est dire). Ainsi, nos virtuoses BAO de l’identification sont capables de vous dire combien de cible-Daesh ont attaqué les Russes (en nombre ridiculement bas) et combien de cibles-“terroristes sympas”, because anti-Assad quoiqu’extrémistes comme vous et moi, ont attaqué les Russes (en nombre monstrueusement élevé). Finian Cunningham s’interroge sur cet autisme persistant du regard nébuleux suivi de l'oeil d’aigle retrouvé et y trouve matière à suspicion (sur Strategic-Culture.org, le 11 octobre 2015). On ne peut pas le lui reprocher.  

« After a year of bombing the Syrian desert with negligible results in terms of defeating terror groups – as memorably noted by Russian lawmaker Alexei Pushkov – all of a sudden the so-called anti-terror coalition led by the United States seems to have discovered a high degree of logistical precision. The US and its allies claim that Russian air strikes, commencing on September 30, have failed to hit the jihadis of Islamic State (IS, ISIS or ISIL), also known as Daesh. Russia, according to Washington and the Western news media, has been striking “moderate rebels” and civilians, and in the process shoring up the “regime” of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

» There’s nothing amiss under international law about supporting the sovereign government of Syria, as Russian President Vladimir Putin has recently stipulated. So let’s kick that Western objection out first of all. As for alleged civilian casualties, CNN, BBC, France 24 and so on have so far not provided one report of funerals or hospital scenes, to verify their earlier high-flown accusations. And this after more than a week since the alleged Russian “atrocities” began. But what is telling about the latest Western protests over Russia’s military intervention is the apparent omniscient precision about who and where the terror groups are.

» Washington officials and Jens Stoltenberg, the secretary-general of the US-led NATO military alliance, this week claimed that “over 90 per cent of Russian air strikes were not against ISIS or Al Qaeda”. The US and NATO’s precise enumeration chimes with that of Turkey’s Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, who claimed that “only two out of 57 Russian air strikes in Syria” hit IS targets. The question that the supine Western media should be asking the NATO chief and his Washington superiors is this: if you can so clearly quantify and delineate the IS and Al Qaeda bases, then why has the US-led coalition evidently been wasting 12 months bombing empty desert spaces instead of degrading and defeating these groups, as vowed by US President Barack Obama over a year ago?

» Since September 2014, the US and some 60 other allied nations, including NATO members, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar, have been bombing Syria and Iraq with the stated purpose of wiping out the IS terror network. So far, more than 9,000 air strikes have been carried out by the US-led coalition, but until Russia opened up its air campaign more than a week ago, the IS and other jihadis had been steadily growing in strength and territory – despite all that US-led air power supposedly raining down on them.

» By contrast, Russia’s air strikes in Syria appear to have achieved more in one week than Washington’s coalition has in more than one year... »

Mis en ligne le 12 octobre 2015 à 11H05