Il n'y a pas de commentaires associés a cet article. Vous pouvez réagir.
389Les avatars du F-22 se poursuivent, et ils se poursuivent toujours dans le même registre : des avatars de système, des avatars électroniques, des avatars conduisant curieusement cet inestimable système à brouiller et brouiller encore l’image parfaite qu’il entendrait donner de lui-même, donc à se brouiller lui-même, — sinon à se brouiller avec lui-même.
Tout cela, — ces remarques légères, — vous donne l’impression de la plaisanterie, de l’ironie facile mais ce n’est pas si sûr. Les ennuis du F-22 sont quelque chose d’essentiel et de gravissime. Vous lirez dans les extraits ci-dessous qu’on parle de ce système, non plus dans les termes classiques de “supériorité aérienne” mais en termes presque postmodernes de “suprématie aérienne”, voire de “domination aérienne”. La logique de cette pensée, qui implique les croyances de l’USAF, le statut de quasi-sainteté qu’a atteint le F-22 au sein de l’USAF, la dévotion portée à l’électronique dans l’arme aérienne, etc., cette logique marquée par l’évolution des expressions conceptuelles débouche à notre sens sur ce qu’on pourrait nommer la “souveraineté aérienne”. Ce serait en fait la mission du F-22, comme élément central du système Network-Centric US (dont le courageux JSF/F-35 est une annexe sympathique où fourguer les amis-alliés). Le F-22 aurait comme destination, non pas la supériorité aérienne, ni la suprématie ou la domination aériennes per se, mais tout cela pour installer au bout du compte, au bout de la mission, la souveraineté aérienne des cieux globalisés pour le compte des USA. Le F-22 est l’hyper-avion de combat affirmant la totalité américaniste des cieux de l’univers.
D’où l’importance des faits et gestes du F-22. Son premier déploiement en Asie devait porter hautement les ambitions US d’affirmer la souveraineté US sur les cieux du monde. C’est un ennui épouvantable d’apprendre que ce déploiement fut très gravement handicapé par les avatars de ses immenses capacités électroniques.
Le site DID (Defense Industry Daily), ce jour, attire notre attention :
«Aircraft software can be serious business. DID's F-22A Raptor FOCUS Article mentioned recent flight software problems that delayed the aircraft's first foreign deployment from Hickam AFB in Hawaii to Kadena AFB, Japan.
»What we didn't mention at the time is how serious the problem was, and how dependent on computers modern aircraft ¬— including military aircraft — have become…»
Suivent alors des précisions intéressantes, extraites simplement d’une émission de CNN du 24 février. Nous reprenons cette transcription du texte mis en ligne par CNN, avec John Roberts comme journaliste de la CNN et l’ancien général Shepperd, de l’USAF, comme consultant.
ROBERTS: Twenty five years from development to deployment, the F-22 Raptor is the most advanced fighting machine in the air. But it was no match for a computer glitch that left six of them high above the Pacific Ocean, deaf, dumb and blind as they headed to their first deployment. So what happened? We turn to a man who's at home in the cockpit, Retired Air Force Major General Don Shepperd. Don, let me set the scene. These F-22s, eight of them, were headed from Hickam (ph) Air Force base in Hawaii to an (INAUDIBLE) Air Force base in Japan. They were approaching the international date line, pick it up from there.
SHEPPERD: You got it right. You want everything to go right with your frontline fighter, $125, $135 million to copy. The F-22 Raptor is our frontline fighter, air defense, air superiority. It also can drop bombs. It is stealthy. It's fast and you want it all to go right on your first deployment to the Pacific and it didn't. At the international date line, whoops, all systems dumped and when I say all systems, I mean all systems, their navigation, part of their communications, their fuel systems. They were -- they could have been in real trouble. They were with their tankers. The tankers - they tried to reset their systems, couldn't get them reset. The tankers brought them back to Hawaii. This could have been real serious. It certainly could have been real serious if the weather had been bad. It turned out OK. It was fixed in 48 hours. It was a computer glitch in the millions of lines of code, somebody made an error in a couple lines of the code and everything goes.
ROBERTS: This is almost like the feared Y2K problem that happened to these aircraft. We should point out that computers control almost every aspect of this aircraft, from their weapons systems, to the flight controls and the computers absolutely went haywire, became useless.
SHEPPERD: Absolutely. When you think of airplanes from the old days, with cables and that type of thing and direct connections between the sticks and the yolks and the controls, not that way anymore. Everything is by computer. When your computers go, your airplanes go. You have multiple systems. When they all dump at the same time, you can be in real trouble. Luckily this turned out OK.
ROBERTS: What would have happened General Shepperd if these brand-new $120 million F-22s had been going into battle?
SHEPPERD: You would have been in real trouble in the middle of combat. The good thing is that we found this out. Any time before, you know, before we get into combat with an airplane like this. Any time you introduce a new airplane, you are going to find glitches and you are going to find things that go wrong. It happens in our civilian airliners. You just don't hear much about it but these things absolutely happen. And luckily this time we found out about it before combat. We got it fixed with tiger teams in about 48 hours and the airplanes were flying again, completed their deployment. But this could have been real serious in combat.
ROBERTS: So basically you had these advanced air… not just superiority but air supremacy fighters that were in there, up there in the air, above the Pacific Ocean, not much more sophisticated than a little Cessna 152 only with a jet engine.
SHEPPERD: You got it. They are on a 12 to 15-hour flight from Hawaii to Okinawa, but all their systems dumped. They needed help. Had they gotten separated from their tankers or had the weather been bad, they had no attitude reference. They had no communications or navigation. They would have turned around and probably could have found the Hawaiian Islands. But if the weather had been bad on approach, there could have been real trouble. Again, you get refueling from your tankers. You don't run… you don't get yourself where you run out of fuel. You always have enough fuel and refueling nine, 10, 11, 12 times on a flight like this where you can get somewhere to land. But again, attitude reference and navigation are essential as is communication. In this case all of that was affected. It was a serious problem.
ROBERTS: So the fact the computers run so much of the systems on these aircraft, General Shepperd, is the… is the military at risk of over engineering here so if they did have a problem like that when they were going into a hostile situation, they could be, as you said, repeatedly in real trouble?
SHEPPERD: Well, you have redundant systems but it's just a fact of life in the modern computer age. By the way John, you are going to have the same problem coming up on your laptop computer as we conferred from -- from standard time from daylight savings time to standard time. Your program… your computer is programmed for one thing and we have changed the dates and you are going to have a problem. It's going to have to be dealt with.
ROBERTS: Do me a favor Don. Make sure I'm not on my laptop computer when I'm flying in an F-22 on that day.
SHEPPERD: Absolutely.
Mis e ligne le 1er mars 2007 à 16H52
-
