Il y a 2 commentaires associés à cet article. Vous pouvez les consulter et réagir à votre tour.
463…Ou bien, disons : tout se passe comme si Ron Paul commençait à tester les possibilités d’une campagne électorale pour les présidentielles de 2012, à l’aide de quelques ballons d’essai… Ainsi, sur MSNBC, dans l’émission Morning Joe, comme le rapporte RAW Story du 14 février 2011. (A noter : deux médias, MSNBC et RAW Story, plus progressistes que conservateurs.) Deux sujets sont abordés.
• L’élection présidentielle… Quelles chances aurait-il contre Obama ? Réponse surprenante mais sans surprise : plus que de gagner la nomination du parti républicain, notamment et essentiellement parce que son électorat dépasse largement ce parti. Conclusion (confirmation pour notre compte) : si Ron Paul veut être un candidat sérieux, il doit se présenter comme indépendant.
«“The reality is it would be very, very difficult,” Rep Paul (R-TX) said on MSNBC's Morning Joe. “But if you look at the polls, and there aren't that many, my appeal is to a lot of independents and a lot of progressive Democrats who are sick and tired of Obama for opting out of cutting back on some of this militarism.”
»“He's a war monger,” Rep. Paul added. “He's expanding the war. My numbers would be much bigger running against Obama than they will be running against some conservative in the Republican primary.”»
• Sur les questions de sécurité nationale, Ron Paul nuance son discours : anti-guerre mais pas anti-défense.
«“I think the problem we have is with the semantics […] They have conditioned us all to use the word defense spending. Who wants to cut defense? I don't want to cut defense. I want a stronger defense.”
»“I want to cut the militarism, the interventionism, the stuff that hurts us, that makes us more vulnerable,” he continued. “If we separate defense from militarism, maybe more people would be willing to accept it. Who wants to be on record who says I just voted against the defense budget.” “I think it's a perception and a semantics problem that we have to try to reeducate the people to understand what we're talking about.”»
dedefensa.org
Forum — Charger les commentaires