Signification de la victoire de Netanyahou

Signification de la victoire de Netanyahou

Robert Parry nous donne un texte circonstancié sur la signification de la victoire de Netanyahou aux élections israéliennes. Pour lui, le Premier ministre et son parti Likoud ont décisivement jeté le masque. En abandonnant la formule de “deux États”, ils ont mis au net l’avenir qu’ils envisagent pour Israël : “Nous savons maintenant qu’il n’y aura pas de solution de deux États avec les Palestiniens alors qu’Israël renforcera décisivement son statut d’État-apartheid, – et tous les cris d’‘antisémitisme’ ne parviendront pas à faire taire les gens qui auront pris acte de ce développement puisque le Premier ministre lui-même a exposé la chose”....

La crise israélo-palestinienne a donc franchi un pas de plus, peut-être décisif. Elle ne cessera pas de sitôt et ne cessera au contraire de s’aggraver. Les conséquences sont à attendre bien entendu au niveau spécifique de cette crise, mais aussi, à notre sens, au niveau de la situation intérieure d’Israël, qui deviendra de plus en plus la véritable crise centrale (sociale, économique, voire identitaire, etc.) de ce pays. (Extrait de l’article de Parry, dans ConsortiumNews, le 18 mars 2015.)

«MI>Netanyahu’s reelection victory has clarified the situation for the American people in another way. We now know there will be no two-state solution with the Palestinians as Israel cements its status as an apartheid state – and all the cries of “anti-Semitism” are not likely to silence people taking notice of this reality since the Israeli Prime Minister himself has taken the sting out of the slur.

»The American people now have little choice but to recognize that Israel intends to maintain and expand its “Jewish state” pushing the Palestinians into isolated enclaves. For nearly a half century, Israel has exercised effective control over these indigenous people in the West Bank and Gaza (totaling more than 4 million people), but there was always the hope of a Palestinian state.

»Now, by jettisoning the prospect of a “two-state solution,” Netanyahu will institutionalize what had long been the unacknowledged fate of the Palestinians. In essence, Netanyahu is opting for a one-state solution, just with most Palestinians confined to a state-less netherworld where they will be denied political rights, left to wither and die. And, whenever some Palestinians act up, Israel will wage war against them, killing thousands at a time and destroying their homes and infrastructure, what Israelis call “mowing the grass.”

»With the facades gone, Americans must decide if they will embrace this apartheid system or not. Many Christian Zionists, who are a powerful force inside the Republican Party, are okay with Israel’s brutal repression because they see the Jews taking this land as a step toward fulfilling a biblical prophecy so Jesus can return to earth as its king. But rational Americans are confronted with a difficult moral choice. Either continue supporting Netanyahu in brutalizing the Palestinians and in his looming war against Iran (using the U.S. military to carry it out) or insist that the U.S. government reassess its relationship with Israel.

»The developments of March 2015 – from Netanyahu’s proconsul-style speech before the U.S. Congress to the racist incitements of his victorious campaign – have forced thoughtful Americans to abandon their longstanding excuses for Israeli behavior. From now on, there’s no pretending that “standing with Israel” doesn’t mean kneeling in an obsequious acceptance of Netanyahu’s cruelty toward the Palestinians and cooperation in an illegal and aggressive war against Iran.»

Mis en ligne le 20 mars 2015 à 08H38