Il n'y a pas de commentaires associés a cet article. Vous pouvez réagir.
823Dans les années 1970, on parlait de l’U.S. Army, retour de la terrible expérience vietnamienne et des troubles qu’elle avait connus, comme d’une “hollow army” (littéralement, une armée sans substance, une armée comme une coquille vide, ou bien encore : une armée qui a perdu son âme à partir des problèmes techniques et surtout psychologiques qu’elle a rencontrés et qu’elle a aggravés).
Ce terme d’“hollow army”, ou “hollow military”, est repris pour Tsahal dans une courte mais très intéressante analyse de Trent Telenko, sur son site Winds of Change.NET, en date du 22 août. De façon très significative, Telenko met l’accent sur les traits de corruption, dans tous les sens du mot, qui caractérisent la Tsahal postmoderne ; corruption psychologique dans les croyances entretenues sur cette armée ; corruption bureaucratique avec les impasses d’équipement, d’entraînement, etc., au profit de la quincaillerie technologique ; corruption de la légitimité, avec les nominations politiques, le favoritisme de la conscription, etc.
Le raisonnement de Telenko :
« I come to this conclusion [that today's Israeli Defense Force (IDF) may be a ‘Hollow Military’] via three routes. My day job is as a Defense Department Quality Specialist. Patterns of Defense corruption are part of my professional training. I have also been a serious military wargamer for more than 25 years. Last, being a military history buff, I have James Dunnigan's How to Make War and Dirty Little Secrets books, Shooting Blanks: War Making That Doesn't Work, and most importantly Getting It Right: American Military Reforms After Vietnam and into the 21st Century, as references for the symptoms of ‘Hollow’ militaries.
» You would expect to see the following things in a ‘Hollow’ draft-based military.
» 1) Shortages of reservist training and reservist stocks and equipment. Check ‘yes’ for the IDF.
» 2) Poor leadership not only at the senior leadership, but all the way down to the battlefield level. Poor leadership that has political cronyism at its heart. The Hezbollah missile strike on the INS Al-Hanit, [Aug. 19, 2006 Jerusalem Post op-ed by Lenny] Ben-Davis plus multiple posts over on “Yonitheblogger.com” makes that another check ‘yes’ for the IDF.
» 3) Draft dodging by the political elites and their children. Again, this is another check mark ‘yes’ for the IDF.
» Israel could clearly still beat Syria in a stand up conventional military fight as the latter’s armed forces have deteriorated faster for the same reasons than Israel’s, but the majority of IDF reservists — who make up between 70 and 80% of the IDF's ground forces — seem to have lost much of their combat effectiveness edge over Arab opponents.
» The unnecessary casualties Israel would take from such a regional war, in particular among its neglected reserves all of whom plus their relatives are voters, may not be demographically or politicallly sustainable. Israeli political elites fearing this result may be why the Olmert government bailed on the opportunity provided by the Bush Administration to eliminate Hezbollah and possibly widen the conflict to Syria. »
Le véritable problème désormais est l’avenir. L’armée américaine mit plus d’une décennie pour se remettre de son effondrement psychologique vietnamien. (Et encore, pour emprunter une voie qui est elle-même une autre forme de corruption de sa substance.) Israël peut-il entreprendre ce processus ? Ces dirigeants ont-ils conscience de la nécessité d’une reconstruction et d’une renaissance de la chose militaire ? Et ainsi de suite : à ces deux questions et d’autres du même style, on sera tenté de proposer des réponses plus que sceptiques. Les perspectives sont alors très sombres.
Selon Telenko :
« If this [IDF military renaissance] does not happen — if Israel's politicians block it — we will know that the Israeli Defense Forces are likely hollow while reform is unlikely until further disasters occur. Israel cannot survive many military disasters. Opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu’s silence on these points, plus his past service as Prime Minister of Israel 1996-99, indicate that the blame here might be shared by all of Israel’s political elites.
» American policy-makers should pay close heed to these matters. Corruption by Israeli political elites might be such that the effectiveness of Israel’s armed forces, and the continued existence of Israel, should no longer be considered as givens. »
Mis en ligne le 28 août 2006 à 15H51