Forum

Vous devriez parler de l’autism des enfants aux USA et le comparer a celui de Washington.

Webster Tarpley parle un peu de cela dans son livre “911 Synthetic Terrorism”.

Il etait aussi le premier a dire que les elections du mid term n’allaient rien changer. Et il a eu une fois de plus raison.

Stephane

PS: Vous pourrieź afficher en dessous des articles les commentaires des lecteurs.

il semble que notre ‘’‘ami’‘’ sarkosy ait ...
(aïe!, haït, haie=buisson=bush)
le Grand dessin de ...
devenir Grand Monarque Impérial de l’Europe
(rien que ça et dans un premier temps, bien sur)

avec les mêmes méthodes que son modèle, bush,

- main-mise sur la presse,
- création d’un faux ennemi (bizarre ces si grossières erreurs de diplomatie de guerre avec l’Iran),
surement a possibilité future de faux attentats en U.S. France attribués à l’Iran pour matter la fronde du peuple,
réunir sous la bannière du grand protecteur nucléarisé,
étouffer la demande de partage des fruits de l’économie,
(modèle Al-Qaïda - ben laden des attentats du 11 sept sous controle du gouvernement des états-unis)
- drainage aberrant des flux financiers vers les Grands Capitalistes,
- création par la guerre de nouveaux états soumis au marché,
etc etc

et les peuples en ont marre de la politique et ont abandonné tous les pouvoirs,
pas de contre-pouvoir, tyrannie.

Les malversations du système financier mondial font l’effondrement du système capitaliste,
l’abandon de son pouvoir de décision fait l’effondrement moral globalisé,
et bientôt,
l’effondrement écologique qui va ajouter à la donne.

en attendant,
attention mr les imperators (de la connerie)
les Nations Nucléaires non alignées sur le Capitalisme états-uniens
vont surement vous remettre à votre place !
en route pour la troisième guerre mondiale!

Quand les gens voudront reprendre leur pouvoir,
il suffira pas de siffler mais il faudra encore virer ces gogos!
vu la pression de tous ces effondrements, il n’y a qu’à attendre
que chacun retrouve l’envie de respirer SA vie.

à bon entendeur.

En ligne ce matin sur Independent.co.uk

Revealed: script for Bush’s mangled words
By David Usborne in New York
Published: 26 September 2007

There is nothing mysterious about George Bush when he comes to the annual General Assembly of the United Nations. He comes, he excoriates countries he doesn’t care for and he leaves. Everyone knows the routine and while some other world leaders may spit his name, they sure know how to pronounce it.

But the President, who used his appearance at the podium yesterday to call for a “mission of liberation” to bring democracy and human rights to countries under dictatorship or repressive rule, needs a little help in this regard.

Heaven forefend that he mangles the names of Sarkozy, say, or Mugabe. We know this thanks to a snafu by the White House staff who mistakenly allowed a few journalists to glimpse a draft of the President’s address complete with phonetic spellings in brackets to assist him with names of people and places. In the correct version for the press, they had been erased.

Safe from Mr Bush’s famously dyslexic tongue, therefore, were the Presidents of France [sar-KO-zee] and Zimbabwe (moo-GAH-bee]. The speech-writers, whose names and even telephone numbers were also posted at the end of the wrongly circulated version, also helped him with the capitals of Zimbabwe [hah-RAR-ray] and of Venezuela [kah-RAH-kus].

Yet, Mr Bush was sometimes left to his own instincts. While prompts were provided for Kyrgyzstan [KEY-geez-stan] and Mauritania [moor-EH-tain-ee-a], he was offered no such help with Sierra Leone or with Aung San Suu Kyi, the opposition leader in Burma. He made two runs at the latter and mangled the former, seemingly renaming it Syria Leone. (A member of his axis of evil, surely.)

Cuba he got right and it was the Cubans who provided still more distraction yesterday when its entire delegation upped and walked out of the General Assembly hall midway through Mr Bush’s speech. This after Mr Bush suggested, referring to the ailing Fidel Castro, that, “the long rule of a cruel dictator is nearing its end. The Cuban people are ready for their freedom.”

In a statement, the Cuban government last night said its boycott was a “sign of profound rejection of the arrogant and mediocre statement” delivered by the American President. “Bush is responsible for the murder of over 600,000 civilians in Iraq… He is a criminal and has no moral authority or credibility to judge any other country.” It concluded: “Cuba condemns and rejects every letter of his infamous tirade.”

Expressions of disdain for Mr Bush by other leaders have become an annual sideshow of the UN Assembly. Last year it was Hugo Chavez of Venezuela who achieved the greatest theatrics saying he could smell sulphur at the podium where Mr Bush had spoken hours before, thus likening him to Satan.

Mr Chavez announced at the last minute yesterday that he would be skipping the Assembly this year where he was scheduled to speak today. So there will be no Bush-Chavez spectacular. The starring role this time may be seized by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran.

Mr Mugabe will have his chance to respond tomorrow when he is scheduled at the podium. Mr Bush said that his government “has cracked down on peaceful calls for reform and forced millions to flee their homeland”. He went on: “The behaviour of the Mugabe regime is an assault on its people.”

Mr Ahmadinejad has used his visit to the New York to underscore Iran’s determination to stand-up to pressure from most of the international community for a suspension of its uranium enrichment activities. But it was unclear how far he had furthered his cause with his appearance at Columbia University on Monday where he was labeled a “petty and cruel dictator” by his hosts and went on to cause bafflement, and even bursts of laughter, when he flatly suggested that there are “no homosexuals in Iran”.

Il n’est pas évident qu’une majorité de la population des Etats-Unis soit contre la guerre en Irak. Il s’agirait plutôt selon moi d’une critique de la façon dont la guerre est, et a été mené.

Le patriotisme et le militarisme sont encore largement des valeurs fortes de la “société américaine”, soumise d’autre part à une telle désinformation qu’il paraît à de nombreuses personnes que la guerre est “nécessaire”.

D’autre part, si la guerre en Irak a ses opposants, celle menée en Afghanistan en a beaucoup moins, malgré les bavures, l’absence totale d’évolution, et de projet politique.

J’ai découvert récemment votre site que je trouve intelligent; mais serait-ce trop vous demander, alors que vous tenez une ligne “critique” vis-à-vis des USA, d’avoir la gentillesse ou au moins la politesse de traduire vos citations en FRANCAIS?